A n selm’s Naming the Unnameable God: Levinas, Derrida and Marion presents a postmodern phenomenological approach to the problem of expressing God’s subtle integrity. The interpretation of Kim to the works of the three French thinkers, attempt to usher the thinking in a unique alternative way of naming this unnameable God, in a way that it would preserve God’s irreducible transcendence and to avoid a sheer kataphasis and sheer apophasis. The following also presents Levinas, Derrida and Marion’s argument is the need to reject ontotheological approach, for such thinking would only be dangerous to believer and non-believer. Ontotheology would only contribute to the oblivion or forgetfulness of being. For such employment method would only recede the nexus towards naming this unnameable God. The following review would give an overview provided by Anselm Kim’s interpretation to Levinas, Derri...